Why Judge Lawrence Mugambi's Security Detail Was Withdrawn - Acting IG Gilbert Masengeli

 Acting Inspector General Gilbert Masengeli now says Judge Justice Lawrence Mugambi's security detail was recalled to attend VIP security courses. 

In a statement to newsrooms on Wednesday evening, September 16, the National Police Service noted that officers attached to institutions like the Judiciary can be recalled at the sole discretion of the IG. 

"It is in the public domain that the IG has accorded the Judiciary, just like the arms of government, the Commissions and other Independent Agencies, the requisite protection, both the institutions and the persons serving therein, without favour or discrimination.

"The officers seconded to such institutions however remain serving officers of the National Police Service who can be reassigned at the sole discretion of the IG. Such was the case with Hon. Justice Mugambi’s security. The two officers, being general duty officers, were recalled for purposes of attending VIP security courses. We are aware that suitable arrangements were made to ensure that Hon. Mugambi’s security was always assured," part of the statement read. 

Masengeli also noted that according to the law, only the President, Deputy President, and retired President are entitled to security. 

"In view of the foregoing, the NPS wishes to rebut the allegations raised by the JSC and to assure the country that security of all Kenyans, Judges included remains our prime consideration. In particular, the NPS notes that other than the President, the Deputy President and the Retired President, no other Kenyan is entitled by law to be provided with personal security detail," the statement adds. 

Chief Justice Martha Koome in a statement on Monday disclosed that the security team of Justice Mugambi was disarmed and withdrawn over the weekend. 

She condemned the move by the police saying any benefits or conditions of service related to a Judge’s position, including their security, must not be varied to their disadvantage, particularly in retaliation for the lawful execution of their judicial duties. 

“The act of withdrawing the security of a sitting Judge, following a judicial decision that displeased certain authorities, is deeply concerning. It sends a chilling message to the Judiciary and the public at large: that those entrusted with upholding justice and safeguarding our rights can be intimidated, bullied, or retaliated against for their rulings,” Koome remarked.